Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4 V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 254%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4 V2  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 212
2-Core 422
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,410
138% 1,132 Pts
64-Core 2,422
150% 2,422 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
Zotac(19DA 5618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 336
Reflection 306
Parallax 346
274% 329 fps
MRender 373
Gravity 271
Splatting 197
220% 280 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 225%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,583
Write 2,359
Mixed 1,808
500% 2,250 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 109
377% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,890
DQ Write 1,418
DQ Mixed 1,540
1,182% 1,616 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
339GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 158 155 144 153 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 165
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 150
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
267GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 115 116 113 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61% Good
Read 96.4
Write 109
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 116
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 42.7
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 31.5
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 UD DDR4 V2 Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback