Acer Veriton M200-Q87

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-Q87  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6630G
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 13:47
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 335
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 078A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.1
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 115
Mixed 57.6
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
hp v236w 16GB
14GB free, PID 7d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 6.2
Mixed 5.5
9% 5.85 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Mixed 0
89% 8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GET.4000C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M200-Q87 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-Q87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback