Lenovo QIWY3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo QIWY3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Product Name
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 11:14
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 71
2-Core 120
57% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 168
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.53 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 59 43 50 52 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 71
Write 102
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 53.8
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QIWY3 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo QIWY3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback