TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220309
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 04:54
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 170
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 356
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 59.9%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8
Parallax 8.6
6% 8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 2.3
7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.26%
 Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 103 9.6 219 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 414
Write 348
Mixed 335
SusWrite 99.6
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 18.9
88% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 38
79% 154 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 58.4%
 Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
52GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 115 68 102 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 107
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 61.9%
 Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 70.4%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples444x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples267x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples260x
GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples704x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples266x
Iris Plus G4IntelBench 6%, 12,263 samples39x
SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples176x
MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GBCrucialBench 139%, 5,621 samples106x
hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GBSKBench 163%, 5,553 samples86x
RAM
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 4,752 samples167x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples72x
AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 1x8GBAdataBench 40%, 2,085 samples68x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback