Besstar N40

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBesstar N40  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR GB1B
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 02:08
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
23% Poor
Memory 34.6
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 68.7
30% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 67.8
9% 67.4 Pts
64-Core 65.5
4% 65.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(1E50 8003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 512GB 512GB
464GB free
Firmware: ZD0R3G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 147 210 168 237 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 278
Write 295
Mixed 255
SusWrite 213
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 24.5
80% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 101
74% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
6GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.2
Write 15.1
Mixed 17.9
24% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N40 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar N40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback