Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 01:20
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 341
102% 196 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,114
108% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 226
Parallax 249
207% 243 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 168
Splatting 137
148% 189 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1359 1356 1163 1158 1110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 1537
Mixed 1,073
SusWrite 1,250
298% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 74.9
256% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 269
343% 600 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 247%
Great: 255%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
519GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 1337 1348 1345 1345 1343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,359
Mixed 1,382
SusWrite 1,335
319% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 95
311% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,334
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,206
908% 1,217 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 296%
Great: 521%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
110GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 136 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 247
Write 135
Mixed 145
SusWrite 135
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 22.6
81% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 67.8
62% 96 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%
1TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 93 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 88.1
Write 70.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 94
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 94 91 89 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 137
Write 149
Mixed 111
SusWrite 90.4
164% 122 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 26.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback