Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 682
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 64.4
55% 67.3 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 64
52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,983
Write 5,859
Mixed 6,776
1,528% 6,873 MB/s
4K Read 467
4K Write 347
4K Mixed 391
1,393% 402 MB/s
DQ Read 1137
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 951
723% 981 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 463%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
711GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 155 154 155 157 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 131
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 153
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
337GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 182 190 184 190 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 119
Write 90.6
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 181
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
221GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 38.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 39.7
53% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GC3000C15K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback