Asus Pro Q670M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro Q670M-C  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$275
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 213
2-Core 412
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 814
8-Core 1,556
141% 1185 Pts
64-Core 2,849
176% 2,849 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 139
109% 131 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2433 2442 2453 1919 624 623 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,482
Write 2,489
Mixed 1,927
SusWrite 1,749
486% 2,162 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 107
365% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1,692
DQ Write 1,349
DQ Mixed 1,493
1,125% 1,511 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 387%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 63.9
MC Mixed 60.8
182% 63.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 30.2
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 164%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro Q670M-C Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro Q670M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback