Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 191
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 683
59% 505 Pts
64-Core 2,048
127% 2,048 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Device(107D 2793) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 116
Parallax 121
106% 122 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 87.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 136 121 99 85 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 249
Write 243
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 126
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 33.6
114% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 145
120% 173 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 91 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 73.7
Write 39.1
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 89
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 202
Write 5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.8
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Mixed 0
214% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GL7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 45.5
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 123%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback