Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 25.2 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 159 45% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 355 39% 307 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 185D) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.2 16% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.3 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 16.1 16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 113 4.1 66 113 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 362 Write 330 Mixed 278 SusWrite 102 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 19 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 168 152% 233 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 5.7 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	366x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	243x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	47x

SSD
SMSM151S3128GD 128GBKingstonBench 45%, 1,082 samples	63x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	177x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	125x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	91x