Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 191 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 481 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 110% MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 139 Parallax 240 99% 167 fps	MRender 214 Gravity 123 Splatting 191 145% 176 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 116%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 854GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 474 Write 465 Mixed 446 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 52.4 170% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 360 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 142GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 5,811 Write 4,873 Mixed 5,117 1,174% 5,267 MB/s	4K Read 509 4K Write 370 4K Mixed 83 1,074% 321 MB/s	DQ Read 836 DQ Write 457 DQ Mixed 698 505% 664 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	218x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	216x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $334

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16