LG B70SV.AS3BB2E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG B70SV.AS3BB2E  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7886
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150114
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 07:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 167
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 256
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 18.6
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 162 171 174 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 399
Write 163
Mixed 127
SusWrite 162
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 7.5
64% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 9.6
21% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 71%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
196GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 109 116 117 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 82.1
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 111
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B70SV.AS3BB2E Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: LG B70SV.AS3BB2E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback