Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 04:22
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 355
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,350
120% 1,016 Pts
64-Core 2,718
168% 2,718 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A750
Intel(8086 1021) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 146
Parallax 219
81% 155 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 167
Splatting 43.9
109% 146 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 109%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
991GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1746 1741 1728 1771 1622 1419 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,447
Write 1,799
Mixed 1,623
SusWrite 1,671
422% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 86.5
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,337
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 1,138
872% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 344%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2516 2316 2284 1826 1465 1431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,667
Write 2,556
Mixed 2,004
SusWrite 1,973
517% 2,300 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 94.2
316% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,140
DQ Mixed 1,259
943% 1,258 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 381%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
930GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 448 446 456 456 456 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 422
Mixed 432
SusWrite 452
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 47.5
167% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 221
166% 223 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
30GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 114 118 119 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 155
Mixed 82
SusWrite 114
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.3
354% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4GB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 209
Mixed 131
136% 182 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.6
2,050% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 84
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 41.1
156% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 34.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 141%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback