Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 14:10
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 511
68% 510 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 66.3
62% 73.1 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 74.1
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
197GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 492
Write 244
Mixed 146
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 13.6
83% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 31.4
91% 200 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 419
Mixed 423
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 41.5
140% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 105
138% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
399GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 105
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.15
72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 24.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback