Lenovo 10ST002FUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10ST002FUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 623
69% 542 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 51.8
38% 51.6 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 53
45% 55.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 931 281 380 219 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1062
Write 826
Mixed 710
SusWrite 486
172% 771 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 805
603% 801 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 151%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19081C Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2667, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10ST002FUS Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10ST002FUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback