Asrock X58 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X58 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '23 at 03:14
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 980-$148 2,215 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 174 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 459 50% 397 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 60.4 Parallax 72.7 38% 59.9 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 58 Splatting 44.9 44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 246 228 249 249 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64% Good	Read 253 Write 249 Mixed 221 SusWrite 242 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 28.8 97% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 187 143% 193 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 101%
Ocz-vert EX2 80GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 44 42 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 130 Write 49.6 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 41.6 16% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 16.2 60% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 50.6 DQ Mixed 65.7 52% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 34%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 445GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 109 109 108 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 119 Write 103 Mixed 86 SusWrite 109 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 21.5 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 14 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 56.8 70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	31x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	24x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	7x

SSD
AGM S128G 128GBAbkoBench 79%, 3 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
CS1030 1TB SSDPNYBench 197%, 1,412 samples	5x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	21x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	19x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16