Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 475
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 72.1
59% 83.3 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 59.9
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 214 119 79 76 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 474
Mixed 387
SusWrite 154
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 124%
Samsun 860 EVO 500G 500GB
314GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 443 454 449 364 365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 451
Mixed 447
SusWrite 418
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 117%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback