Asrock J4125B-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock J4125B-ITX  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 19:46
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 117
43% 75 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 198
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 78 34 46 44 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 465
Write 373
Mixed 365
SusWrite 64.4
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 21.8
92% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 0.9
56% 131 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
78GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 96 96 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 60.3
Write 61.1
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 95.8
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G_Skill F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 12.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4125B-ITX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4125B-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback