Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600M 7,260 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 46.1 1-Core 20 2-Core 41 25% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 51.9 8-Core 71.9 8% 61.9 Pts	64-Core 54.5 3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 501E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1.8 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.8 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 290 262 330 314 321 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 361 Write 345 Mixed 268 SusWrite 307 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 17.8 59% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 119 100% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GLSTU160N02 1x8GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-4600MIntelBench 56%, 7,260 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x

RAM
SP008GLSTU160N02 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 335 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16