Dell Precision M4800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M4800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0V5GVY
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 23:31
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4940MX
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 147
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 272
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
Dell(1028 15CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 32.3
19% 29.1 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 23.1
20% 25.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.2
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 109 79 83 166 109 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 713
Write 388
Mixed 262
SusWrite 146
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 16.4
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 228
179% 246 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 445%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 22 20 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 42.1
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 23.1
18% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 92%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.3 4.3 4.8 4.6 5.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.4
8% 8.33 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 9%
ZALMAN External HDD 1TB
191GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 66 51 52 91 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 223
Mixed 198
SusWrite 80.1
234% 175 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 14.6
1,126% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 24.4
1,872% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 102%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 22
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4800 Builds (Compare 2,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback