Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120503
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 288
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 86.2
52% 70.7 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 46.7
48% 60 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 223 224 211 214 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 387
Write 244
Mixed 304
SusWrite 232
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 36.4
121% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 331
245% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
2GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.6
Write 33
Mixed 42.9
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
802GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 77 78 77 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 86.7
Write 91.7
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 77.5
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
802GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 125 120 127 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 97.5
Write 98.1
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 122
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 84%
General UDisk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.4 6.7 5.4 6.4 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 451
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 6
78% 115 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Mixed 0
408% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5403-046.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 99U5403-046.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $564
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback