MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 19:33
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 273
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 1,014
92% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,925
119% 1,925 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Dell(1028 3759) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 96
Parallax 108
89% 105 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 103
Splatting 84.1
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2262 1495 1083 722 1296 1657 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2,385
Write 3,480
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 1,419
506% 2,247 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 31.6
122% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 964
689% 894 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 257%
Great: 448%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
511GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 146 147 147 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 143
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 84%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
327GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 108 107 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 74
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 105
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 41.1
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 38.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback