Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 11:36
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 65.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 269
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 997
92% 766 Pts
64-Core 2,080
129% 2,080 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 403B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 360
Parallax 264
192% 287 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 247
Splatting 184
202% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 177%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEL1D380GA 380GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010450
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,303
Write 2,030
Mixed 2127
480% 2,154 MB/s
4K Read 214
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 194
672% 198 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1029
782% 1,058 MB/s
Poor: 346% Great: 540%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
831GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 438 442 444 442 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 434
Mixed 434
SusWrite 440
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 54
178% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 110%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
359GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 444 445 445 443 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 448
Mixed 406
SusWrite 444
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 53.3
176% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
224GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1942 1942 1936 1929 1920 1943 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,321
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 1,935
436% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 64.3
232% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1,087
827% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 333%
Great: 526%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 106 110 109 110 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 98.1
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 108
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 29.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 28.8
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback