Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 178 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 324 41% 313 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB CLim: 1494 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 19.6 Parallax 19.4 17% 19.8 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 17.7 18% 22 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM250HJ 250GB-$30 462 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AK10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 72 68 89 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	45% Average	Read 78 Write 98.1 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 78.5 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.8 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	8x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	3x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	2x

SSD
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	9x
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GBBench 96%, 6,836 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	2x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 51%, 176 samples	2x
M378B5773SB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 10GBSamsungBench 35%, 8 samples	2x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $41