Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 32.6 1-Core 41 2-Core 75.1 29% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 126 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.5 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SLCB-2242 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN06201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 280 328 223 166 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 398 Write 411 Mixed 392 SusWrite 254 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 32.9 110% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 200 151% 205 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 240 17% 240 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	38x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	39x

SSD
256GB NS550-2242 256GBTeclastBench 54%, 255 samples	20x
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	5x
BD256GB SLCB-2242 256GBTeclastBench 70%, 5 samples	5x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	28x
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16