PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190925 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '23 at 16:42 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
77.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 291 292 284 283 280 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Sandisk Ultra II 1TB
159GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 213 219 215 220 201 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
274GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 411 424 431 433 433 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
268GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 123 125 123 124 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
75GB free
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 63 62 63 MB/s
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 111 115 111 113 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
96.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 492x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 339x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 255x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 386x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 151x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 119x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $1,351 |