Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 840
77% 645 Pts
64-Core 2,305
143% 2,305 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.6% Good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 87.3
Parallax 75.6
74% 84.4 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 71.1
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 291 292 284 283 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 415
Write 434
Mixed 407
SusWrite 301
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 129%
Sandisk Ultra II 1TB
159GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 213 219 215 220 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 394
Write 340
Mixed 275
SusWrite 228
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 19.4
74% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 201
185% 285 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
274GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 411 424 431 433 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 436
Mixed 386
SusWrite 426
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 30.2
111% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
14GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 437
Mixed 426
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 33.4
121% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
268GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 123 125 123 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 124
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
75GB free
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 50.8
Write 58.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 63.1
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 111 115 111 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 155
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 118
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
374% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 32.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback