Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 07:26
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 184
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 903
70% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,776
110% 1,776 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 167D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 29.9
163% 107 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 30
Splatting 49.4
31% 36.1 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 115%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 928
Write 1282
Mixed 978
239% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 13.3
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 39.9
DQ Mixed 51.2
36% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 194% Great: 496%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
8GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 38.2
Mixed 55.2
73% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
179% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 9,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback