Dell PowerEdge R410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R410  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 05:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 82.2
48% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 478
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 1072
66% 1072 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
MSI(1462 8A9E) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.1
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 292GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 74 77 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 189
Write 73.2
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 76
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5170FH0-CH9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R410 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback