Default X670E PG Lightning

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 321%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 382%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics328% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 5 days ago.
SystemDefault X670E PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E PG Lightning
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 03:27
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 180
2-Core 363
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1341
121% 1,019 Pts
64-Core 2,500
155% 2,500 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
328% Outstanding
Lighting 509
Reflection 523
Parallax 588
415% 540 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 520
Splatting 256
326% 418 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 328%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2488 2588 2570 2592 2576 2600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 2,258
Mixed 1,891
SusWrite 2,569
486% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 78.1
257% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,775
DQ Write 1,539
DQ Mixed 1,664
1,245% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 384%
Great: 591%
Hyundai Sapphire S3T480G 480GB
353GB free
Firmware: Q0120B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 9.8 162 104 42 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 391
Write 388
Mixed 316
SusWrite 160
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 19.2
106% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 0.6
48% 113 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
249GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 449 428 408 377 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 493
Mixed 414
SusWrite 409
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.1
208% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 367
272% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 54.2
160% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 47.6
SC Write 59.6
SC Mixed 49.6
149% 52.3 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 155%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X670E PG Lightning Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

System: Default X670E PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback