Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 23:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 187
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 344
41% 314 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 86.3
Reflection 87.9
Parallax 9.4
70% 61.2 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 70
64% 79.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8/1000G 1TB
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 1048 237 40 361 821 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 1,393
Mixed 931
SusWrite 539
232% 1,033 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 15.3
106% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 585
DQ Mixed 364
326% 489 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 138%
Great: 237%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
676GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 71 80 93 98 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback