Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime20.4 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 20:36
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 747
77% 620 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 105
Parallax 144
77% 115 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 107
Splatting 74.1
72% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 448
Mixed 426
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 40.6
140% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
117GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,455
Write 1183
Mixed 769
251% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 46.3
166% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 518
393% 536 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 220%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
64GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 450
Mixed 432
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 40.1
139% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 348
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74
Write 80.7
Mixed 51.7
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 37.8
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $718
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback