Acer Veriton S6610G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton S6610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S6610G
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 343
39% 303 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 38
Parallax 36.1
28% 36.3 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 37
Splatting 26.3
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0053-1C1173 1TB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 47 60 79 77 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 96
Write 92.4
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 70.9
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 48%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB PSD38G16002 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton S6610G Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Veriton S6610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback