Lenovo 20QJ001MGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20QJ001MGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QJ001MGE
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 10:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 98
2-Core 186
59% 110 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 445
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5127) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.40.06
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 13.3
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.4
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 789 788 790 822 831 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 861
Mixed 855
SusWrite 794
209% 932 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 14.9
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 170
136% 190 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 124%
Great: 347%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 121
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
180% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20QJ001MGE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20QJ001MGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback