Ciara Q87M-DA

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Ciara Q87M-DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 180 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 515 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 540 34% 540 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2120 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.9% Poor	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 82.1 Parallax 77.1 3% 54.4 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 75.3 61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 207 208 204 210 203 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 461 Mixed 380 SusWrite 219 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 85 4K Mixed 46.8 156% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 256 217% 318 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown-033.A00LF 4x4GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-DA Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Q87M-DA

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	16x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	16x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	3x
Fury 240GBHyperX $65Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x

RAM
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 4x4GBCrucialBench 55%, 50 samples	5x
CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.8F1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 14 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknown-033.A00LFBench 53%, 182 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369