Aierben AP56

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel AP56
MotherboardAierben AP56  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 23:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1280P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 56.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 316
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 729
84% 652 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 23.6
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 18.9
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 1893 1889 1179 1096 1070 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,220
Write 1,990
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,421
420% 1,872 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 70.6
255% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,412
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1,133
862% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 307%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56 5 Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C8FB 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AP56 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Aierben AP56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback