Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 59.5 2-Core 104 44% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 147 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21E2) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Aego 120GB 120GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 132 141 141 143 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 418 Write 365 Mixed 359 SusWrite 163 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 28.7 95% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 99.1 105% 174 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $160

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16