Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3530MX APU 441 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 57.2 33% 49.2 Pts	4-Core 85.7 8-Core 97.3 12% 91.5 Pts	64-Core 89.7 6% 89.7 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C609) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.4 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 107 164 167 171 179 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.2% Poor	Read 128 Write 102 Mixed 104 SusWrite 147 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 7 30% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CH9 2x4GB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
SU 630 240GBAdataBench 62%, 346 samples	2x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 34%, 128 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16