Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 07:40
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 110
50% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 159
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-480-G2 480GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 365
Write 295
Mixed 269
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 19.6
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 33.1
72% 147 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 93%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB
4GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18
Write 10.5
Mixed 12.7
16% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback