Asus K55VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K55VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55VD
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 06:30
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 96.5
45% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 92.9
8-Core 138
14% 115 Pts
64-Core 93.9
6% 93.9 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1457) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 243 280 262 248 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 417
Write 311
Mixed 313
SusWrite 262
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 18.9
77% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 108
94% 141 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 8.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55VD Builds (Compare 917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback