Dell Precision 7720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemDell Precision 7720  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05JP47
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 20:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 72
2-Core 179
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 251
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 07B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SB2 960GB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 352 334 319 318 322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 229
Write 95.9
Mixed 255
SusWrite 326
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 26.3
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 214
180% 262 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 138 139 142 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 116
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 140
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7720 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 7720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback