Cincoze DS-1300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCincoze DS-1300  (all builds)
MotherboardCINCOZE DS-1300
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 13:58
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600KF-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 847
87% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5239
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 26
Parallax 19.3
17% 22.2 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 21.1
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 447 405 450 425 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,028
Write 171
Mixed 216
SusWrite 435
101% 463 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 32
123% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 138
139% 236 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 118%
Great: 321%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-8GSSOCIK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 26.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 26.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DS-1300 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Cincoze DS-1300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback