TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30G1CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive420% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30G1CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1059
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 20:57
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 191
2-Core 384
112% 216 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,138
112% 917 Pts
64-Core 2,231
138% 2,231 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400 4GB
Legend(17AA 1613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.25
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 19.3
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 21.7
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 17.5%
 Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BL7 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8L2QGXB7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1872 2845 2901 3129 3108 3118 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 2,722
Write 3,048
Mixed 2,860
SusWrite 2829
648% 2,864 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 88.3
272% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,409
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,173
881% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 169% ↑
This bench: 420%
 Great: 507%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
560GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2004 2615 2660 1078 314 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,190
Write 2,378
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 1,513
368% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.7
227% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,404
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1,367
983% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑
This bench: 266%
 Great: 368%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150
124GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 347 339 291 324 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 403
Write 359
Mixed 282
SusWrite 335
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 28.4
97% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 141
104% 136 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 72.7%
 Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 24.1
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 67.4%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 30G1CTO1WW Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30G1CTO1WW

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel  $275Bench 117%, 66,991 samples3x
Core i7-12700KIntel  $220Bench 114%, 78,749 samples2x
Core i7-12700IntelBench 108%, 25,535 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 8%, 19,750 samples6x
T400 4GBNvidiaBench 18%, 551 samples2x
RTX A5000 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 117%, 371 samples1x
SSD
MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBMicronBench 286%, 1,522 samples2x
MZVL22T0HBLB-00BL7 2TBSamsungBench 376%, 649 samples2x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GBSamsungBench 306%, 4,571 samples2x
RAM
M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 1x31GBSamsungBench 75%, 632 samples5x
M426R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 129%, 25 samples2x
CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 4x31.8GBCrucialBench 115%, 38 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback