Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Wortmann TERRA MOBILE 1512 (all builds)
Motherboard	Wortmann TERRA MOBILE 1512
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 877 671 User benchmarks, average bench 41% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 46.2 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 27.3 24% 32.2 Pts	4-Core 32.2 8-Core 31.4 4% 31.8 Pts	64-Core 31.4 2% 31.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Clevo(1558 2400) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1.8 0% 0.87 fps	MRender 0.6 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 187 250 209 289 319 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 266 Write 259 Mixed 263 SusWrite 250 59% 260 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 16.6 52% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 67.2 DQ Write 45.3 DQ Mixed 54.3 41% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 877IntelBench 41%, 671 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 50%, 50 samples	1x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80