Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 318
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47% Average
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 171
Parallax 178
11% 121 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 139
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 47%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 1138 1398 1407 651 1047 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,642
Write 1398
Mixed 1,607
SusWrite 1,117
324% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 50.1
166% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 609
466% 653 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 216%
Great: 573%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
464GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 288 328 353 398 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 400
Mixed 292
SusWrite 335
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
140GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 290 325 296 283 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 357
Mixed 365
SusWrite 289
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 50
163% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMD16GX4M2B3000C15 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback