Acer ConceptD CC314-73P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer ConceptD CC314-73P  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Beatles_TLS_T
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 10:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 206
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 705
66% 546 Pts
64-Core 1048
65% 1048 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 156C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 48.8
Parallax 10.4
7% 22.8 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 9.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 1041 1056 1064 1068 1067 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,065
Write 2,211
Mixed 1,922
SusWrite 1,051
408% 1,812 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 66.6
207% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 558
421% 567 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 237%
Great: 388%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 11.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CC314-73P Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Acer ConceptD CC314-73P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback