HP 810-170st

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 810-170st  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACE
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 04:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 545
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 188
Parallax 177
141% 179 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 181
Splatting 125
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$145
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 421 423 441 436 435 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 411
Write 398
Mixed 357
SusWrite 428
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 35
113% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 271
202% 269 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D Kingston HP698651-154-KEB Kingston HP698651-154-KEB 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-170st Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-170st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback