Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory40.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 00:47
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 560
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 112
Parallax 102
88% 107 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 105
Splatting 101
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 301
Mixed 292
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 21.9
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 179
133% 179 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
475GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 409
Write 383
Mixed 349
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 23.8
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 204
155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,553
Write 1,406
Mixed 1,339
320% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 41.6
129% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 229
171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 526%
Amd-raid ST14000NM001G-2K 14TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.5
Write 107
Mixed 33.2
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 138%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.2
Write 52.3
Mixed 54.2
45% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
2TB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62
Write 67.7
Mixed 26.7
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 59%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 182
Mixed 101
118% 159 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
753% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
502GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 165
Write 169
Mixed 123
193% 152 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.6
216% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 39.9
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 19.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback