TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 2QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16J1  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 13:37
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 111
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 155
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1125) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 41
Parallax 2.2
2% 15.2 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.05%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 128GB-$126
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 187
Mixed 152
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 20.9
77% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 82.4
DQ Mixed 117
101% 155 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
880GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 105 111 109 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 20.2
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 105
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/4G KHX1600C9S3L/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 38.6%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J1 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J1

CPU
Core i7-5700HQIntelBench 69%, 14,004 samples129x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples92x
Core i5-4210HIntelBench 55%, 12,540 samples6x
GPU
HD Graphics 5600IntelBench 4%, 7,009 samples84x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples60x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples53x
SSD
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples52x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples9x
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GBBench 78%, 1,122 samples8x
RAM
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 4,507 samples63x
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 6,146 samples30x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples21x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback