Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P249-G2-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lynx_SK
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 06:41
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 128
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1133) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 596 271 306 305 321 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 714
Write 420
Mixed 950
SusWrite 354
137% 609 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 44.4
134% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 581
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 376
294% 413 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 112%
Great: 271%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
249GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 106 105 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 58
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 97.9
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FR 04CB AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P249-G2-M Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback