Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 02:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 770
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (145 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 145
Parallax 145
118% 145 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 138
Splatting 121
109% 135 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ax5000 512GB 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,333
Write 2,310
Mixed 1,466
384% 1,703 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 72.2
235% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 728
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 940
690% 892 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 269%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
486GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 128 119 127 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 169
Write 173
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 125
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 36.7
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $574
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback